Drip Tape Trials

Click here to download trialDownload pdf
Structure® Research
ACTAGRO Research Report:
Evaluation of Phosphate Fertilizer Type on Plugging of Drip Irrigation
Tape Research completed by:
Center for Irrigation Technology. California Water Institute California State University, Fresno, CA


Introduction
Phosphate fertilizers have a widely held reputation for reacting with other materials including the dissolved salts in irrigation water to form solids that can plug drip emitters and tapes. Phosphates can combine with many common canons in water to form precipitates with very low solubility. The propensity for phosphates 10 precipitate with Calcium, Magnesium and other metallic ions that occur in irrigation water is the basis for the commonly issued warning to avoid the use of phosphate fertilizers in fertigation programs. The undeniable advantages of drip systems for applying fertilizers with the same precision as the water applications have not been extended to fertilizer programs where phosphates are needed by the crop. Unfortunately fears of permanent plunging of the drip system by chemical precipitates prevent or limit the use of this potentially effective method of phosphate fertilizer application.
Liquid forms of phosphate fertilizers are limited to Phosphoric acid (0-54-01 and Ammonium Polyphosphate solution (10-34-0). Phosphoric acid is usually very expensive and 10-34-0 is commonly assumed to form precipitates with even a small amount of Calcium in the irrigation water. Recently, the CSU Fresno - Center for Irrigation Technology was approached by Actagro, the manufacturer of the organic based, liquid phosphate fertilizer called Structure®. Their experience suggested that an organic complex containing phosphate might be less likely to react with Calcium in the water; consequently, this new form of phosphate fertilizer would be more successful in a fertigation program.
A testing program was devised to compare the organic-phosphate material along with the two common inorganic forms in drip tape using poor quality, high Calcium irrigation water. The testing program was designed to evaluate the plugging potential of the fertilizers under conditions at least as extreme as those encountered in the field. A very high application rate of phosphate was used in both new and used tapes and with water sources selected for high salinity and Calcium content. The results were somewhat surprising, in addition to the organic phosphate material demonstrating almost no plugging problem, a surprising conclusion from this evaluation was the fact that each of the drip tapes tested maintained a normal delivery under conditions that were initially expected to cause serious plugging. While this simple series of tests should not be construed as conclusive proof that certain phosphates can be applied through drip tapes without any danger of plugging, it does indicate the fact that the ability of modern drip tapes to handle poor quality water and solids has been considerably underestimated.

Methodology
The effects of adding three fertilizer materials, 10-34-0 liquid ammonium polyphosphate, 0-54-0 phosphoric acid, and Structure® (organic based phosphorus fertilizer) on drip tape flows were evaluated with various water sources. A system traditionally used to lest plugging of drip tape by sand particles from media filters was used for the tests. The system entails a pump, pressure regulation system, heat exchanger, and two 25 ft. runs of drip tape used to test plugging or reduced flow rates. Once water and fertilizer was emitted from the drip tape it was recirculate through the system continually. Flow rates were recorded periodically during the test. Flow rates of individual emitters were recorded and converted to gallons per hour. Initial tests of the study were run for a time period of four hours but latter tests were extended in time to induce more plugging. Fertilizers were added to the system by pouring a stock solution into the test apparatus’ reservoir. The extended tests were similar to the shorter test but additional readings were made every two hours until late in the day approximately fifteen hours after the start of the test the system was shutdown for the night. The testing system was restarted the next morning, allowed to run for thirty minutes, after which flow rates were recorded. Depending on seventy of plugging a flush with clean test water or phosphoric acid (0-54-0) was done after which additional flow rates were recorded. Table 1. is an example the type of data created with the extended test.
Table 1: Example of data produced from extended test of Actagro Structure® with Coastal well water and Salinas Valley drip tape showing nominal plugging from fertilizer injection and full recovery of flow.
Drip Tape Plugging test results - drip tape flow rates
 Fertilizer-Organic / Test Water-Coastal / Drip Tape-Salinas Valley
Sample Time 745 910 1040 1240 1530 1530 2130 1245 1400
Sample Description Test Water Fert+0.5 h Fert+2 h Fert+4 h Fert+7 h Fert+10 h Fert+13 h Fert+28 h Post Flush
Reading No Reading 1 Reading 2 Reading 3 Reading 4 Reading 5 Reading 6 Reading 7 Reading B Reading 9
GPH/Emitter 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.22 0.23
% of Initial Flow Rate 100% 101% 101% 101% 100% 97% 94% 100% 104%
 
The testing conditions were a simulation of two extreme situations in California where phosphate fertilizer could be used in vegetable production irrigated with drip tape. In each case, typical drip tape and poor quality water from each simulated location was used. Testing with high quality water was also done for calibration of the testing equipment and procedures. Three types of water were used as test water for evaluation (Table 6). Fresno State campus water was used to represent high quality water, tile drain water from southern Kings County with high levels of calcium, magnesium and sodium was used to represent low quality, Central Valley water, and well water from northern Monterey County with high levels of calcium was used to represent low quality Salinas Valley water. Two types of drip tape were chosen to match the different test waters. A 6” spacing tape (Toro Aqua-Traxx EAXxx0667) typical of those used in the coastal vegetable growing and strawberry production regions was used for the Salinas Valley simulation and a 12” tape (T-Tape TSX 7XX-12-220) typical for vegetable and field crop production in the southern San Joaquin Valley was used with the tile drain water source. Both tapes were obtained from growers in these situations. The tape was new in each case but some of the Central Valley was duplicated with similar tape recovered from the field after three seasons and no differences in results were apparent. The fertilizers were all applied at a rate of 150 lbs/A of P205 which is a very high rate but one that could be required for a high value crop in either location.

Results

The original 4 hour testing procedure did not result in significant plugging with any tape. Water source or fertilizer combination, although there was a tendency for flows to slow where 10-34-0 was used. The four hour period with the fertilizer in the tape was apparently insufficient time to all the chemical precipitation to form or accumulate. The test procedure was modified to increase the time and add a second cycle to simulate a second irrigation with the fertilizer remaining in the tape between irrigations. Plugging was observed with this longer test procedure. Figure 2 and Table 2 show the Salinas Valley test with 10-34-0 and the tape was almost completely plugged by the end of the first run and did not recover at the beginning of the second irrigation cycle, the test equipment failed during the second cycle so the flushing with acid to test the recovery from the plugging could not be completed, Table 3 and Figure 3 show the same fertilizer with good water and the Central Valley tape. The results were similar to those in Table 2 in that complete plugging occurred at the end of the first irrigation and the interval before the second. In this case, flushing with acid was able to restore about 40% of the emitters to nearly their original flow rate. The organic based phosphate fertilizer, Structure®, caused some reduction in flow rate under the same conditions but the loss was about 10% compared to nearly 100% plugging with the 10-34-0. Flushing with just water in the second irrigation cycle restored the original flow rate of the tape for each the Salinas Valley simulation. Table 4 and Figure 4 and the Central Valley simulation. Table 5 and Figure 5. These simulations, made intentionally extreme, are intended to demonstrate that phosphate fertilizers can be safely applied through drip tape. Note that without proper precautions and care, chemical precipitates can still form and slow or stop tape flow under field conditions similar to these. The interesting results found in the tests were these:  

1. The chemical precipitation may require several hours to form and cause plugging. Short fertigation periods, as recommended by Actagro for use of Structure®, may be safer than long runs.
2. Phosphate fertilizer remaining in the tape because of insufficient post-application flushing can be responsible for additional plugging problems.
3. Some forms of phosphate fertilizers, such as Actagro Structure®, produce significantly less chemical precipitate than other forms and have demonstrated less plugging potential.
4. Tapes in current use are capable of being flushed after partial plugging with phosphate fertilizers to restore some, and perhaps all of the original performance.

It would appear that the “fatal plugging” by phosphate fertilizers of drip tape and emitters that was observed in the first years of the use of drip irrigation is not as big a problem as it once was. The use of phosphate and other low solubility fertilizers may be considered for fertigation programs with appropriate choice of material, testing and careful monitoring, flushing and maintenance of the system.

Additional Results

As an aside to the original study, Actagro asked CIT/CWI to evaluate the concern that lower flow tapes (like the “coastal” tape used here), might in some way harbor a larger residual quantity of Structure® organic-phosphorus fertilizer than other drip tapes. Fully eliminating the residual color from Structure® after application in the above testing was a concern from the start. It was observed that it took a considerable effort, more than 1 flushing, to fully eliminate all residual color from the test apparatus after Structure® application. As it was observed that no plugging resulted from normal use of Structure®, it was assumed that any remaining quantities of phosphorus were very low. It was decided to measure the product concentration at which no visible light passed through samples as an indicator of how well a known quantity of material “dyed” the water. There was significant dark color in the samples at 0.1% and 0.5% of the original application concentration. At just 0.3% of the original application concentration, there was no transmittance of visible light. This worked out to just 32 ounces product/100 gallons of water. The very dark color created by this very low level of fertilizer product eliminates concern that something inherent in the tape causes an accumulation of product in the tape. The concentration of Structure® in the tape rapidly decreases proportionate to the amount of water flowing through the tape after the fertilizer injection ceases. When the ends of a drip line are opened to flush the system with brand new tape, the material is first very dark, then lightens somewhat, but takes awhile to fully clear. This would also be the case in tape that has already been used and possibly exacerbated by any imperfections in filtration or tape maintenance to that point.

 
Table 2: Table summarizing data evaluating 10-34-0, coastal water, and Salinas Valley drip tape.
Drip Tape Plugging Test Results - Drip Tape Flow Rates
Fertilizer - 10-34-0 / Test Water - Coastal / Drip Tape - Salinas Valley
Sample Time 715 2200 800
Sample Description Test Water Fert + 14 h Fert + 24 h
Reading # Reading 1 Reading 8 Reading 9
GPH/Emitter 0.23 0.02 0.01
% of Initial Flow Rate 100% 9% 6%
Fig. 2: Graphic illustrating reduction of drip tape flow rates when running 10-34-0 and coastal water through Salinas Valley drip tape.
 
Table 3: Table summarizing data evaluating 10-34-0, campus water, and Central Valley drip tape.
Drip Tape Plugging Test Results - Drip Tape Flow Rates
Fertilizer - 10-34-0 / Test Water - Campus / Drip Tape - Central Valley
Sample Time 640 2200 850
Sample Description Test Water Fert + 14 h Fert + 24 h
Reading # Reading 1 Reading 8 Reading 11
GPH/Emitter 0.17 0.00 0.07
% of Initial Flow Rate 100% 0% 40%
Fig. 3: Reduction in flow rates of drip tape after several hours of running 10-34-0 and campus water in Central Valley drip tape.
 
Table 4: Table summarizing data evaluating an organic fertilizer (Actagro Structure®), coastal water, and Salinas Valley drip tape.
Drip Tape Plugging Test Results - Drip Tape Flow Rates
Fertilizer - Organic / Test Water - Coastal / Drip Tape - Salinas Valley
Sample Time 745 2130 1400
Sample Description Test Water Fert + 13 h Post Flush
Reading # Reading 1 Reading 7 Reading 9
GPH/Emitter 0.22 0.21 0.23
% of Initial Flow Rate 100% 94% 104%
Fig. 4: Drip tape flow rates slightly decreased when running an organic fertilizer (Actagro Structure®) and coastal water through Salinas Valley drip tape.
 
Table 5: Table summarizing data evaluating an organic fertilizer (Actagro Structure®), drainage water, and previously used Central Valley drip tape.
Drip Tape Plugging Test Results - Drip Tape Flow Rates
Fertilizer - 10-34-0 / Test Water - Campus / Drip Tape - Central Valley
Sample Time 640 2200 850
Sample Description Test Water Fert + 14 h Fert + 24 h
Reading # Reading 1 Reading 8 Reading 11
GPH/Emitter 0.17 0.00 0.07
% of Initial Flow Rate 100% 0% 40%
Fig. 5: Drip tape flow rates slightly decreased when running an organic fertilizer (Actagro Structure®) and drainage water through previously used Central Valley drip tape, flow fully recovered with water flush cycle.
 
Fig 6: It was observed that it took a considerable effort to fully eliminate all residual color from the test apparatus after Structure® application. As it was observed that no plugging resulted from normal use of Structure®, it was assumed that any remaining quantities of phosphorus were very low. It was decided to measure the product concentration at which no visible light passed through samples as an indicator of how well a known quantity of material “dyed’ the water. There was significant dark color in the samples at 0.1 % and 0.5% of the original application concentration. At just 0.3% of the original application concentration, there was no transmittance of visible light. This worked out to just 32 ounces/100 gallons of water. The very dark color created by this very low level of fertilizer product eliminates concern that something inherent in the tape causes an accumulation of product in the tape. The concentration of Structure® in the tape rapidly decreases proportionate to the amount of water flowing through the tape after the fertilizer injection ceases.

Actagro Structure® Fertilizer Solution Color
Vials
Table 6: Water Test Results for Drip Flow During Fertigation
ds/m meq/l meq/l meq/l meq/l meq/l meq/l ppm ppm
Source pH ECw Ca Mg Na Alk SO4 Cl SAR B NO3-N
Kings Co. Tile Drain 7.92 2.37 3.2 1.77 22.4 12.1 8.48 3.77 14.2 0.96 20.5
CSUF Campus Well 7.57 0.48 1.25 0.77 1.25 2.54 0.11 0.34 1.24 0.1 1
Soledad Well 7.33 2.97 9.8 6.15 5.95 5.33 10.5 3.25 2.11 0.42 23.5







Return To Top